Two more things the database has been recording and the interface has
never shown.
**Who a task is waiting on, on the row.** Only when it is not you: your own
list would otherwise carry your own face on every line, which is a column
of one initial telling you nothing. The point of showing an assignee is
that it is somebody else.
That needed names, and a task carries only an `assignee_id`. `GET /people`
is the primitive: everybody you share a project with, plus yourself,
fetched once per session. Not per row, and not per project either — a list
would have to know which project each task belongs to before it could ask
for that project's members. Deliberately *not* the instance's user list,
which is `/users` and administrators only: a task list has no business
enumerating everybody with an account here.
It sits first in the meta line, because who changes what the rest of the
line means — a date on somebody else's task is their deadline, not yours.
**And the activity log.** Nineteen kinds of entry have been written since
the beginning — every project, section, member, task and comment event —
and `GET /projects/{id}/activity` has answered honestly the whole time with
nothing on the other end. There is a Historik panel on the project now,
loaded when it is opened rather than with the page, and the event keys
become Danish in exactly one place. An unknown key falls through to itself
rather than being hidden: a build that records something this table has not
learned should still show that it happened.
One test assertion had to change, and it is worth saying why. It matched
"males inden fredag" against a row whose title is "males inden" — quick add
read "fredag" as the due date — so it was really matching the title
concatenated with the metadata beside it. Putting the assignee between them
broke it. The assertion now names the task's own text.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
`assignee_id` has been on tasks since sharing was built and delegating has
been possible from the drawer since yesterday. What was missing was
anywhere to see it: work handed to somebody else left your lists and
appeared in nothing.
GET /delegated returns everything assigned to somebody who is not you, in
the projects you can see, grouped by the person. Grouped on the server
rather than flat, because the question is about people — "what is Anders
sitting on" — and a client cannot group it itself: it would need the name
behind an assignee id from a project it does not happen to have open, and
there is no way to ask for that. The names come back with the tasks, so
one request is one screen.
The filter is a field of its own rather than a sentinel in AssigneeID.
"What is on my plate" and "what have I handed over" are different
questions, and one string that means an id most of the time and a magic
word the rest is a field somebody eventually passes a real id to.
An assignee whose account is gone is named "Ukendt" rather than dropped.
Losing the row would make work disappear from the one view that exists to
stop work disappearing.
The sidebar entry only appears where delegating is possible at all. On an
instance with one person it could never have anything in it, and a
permanent empty entry is a question the sidebar keeps asking and answering
"no".
Building it turned up a bug in the split above it. "Projekter" and "Delt
med mig" were divided on `shared`, which only means the project has more
than one member — so inviting somebody to a project of your own moved it
under "Delt med mig", where it lost its place in the order, stopped being
draggable, and could not be filed under a group. It is divided on
ownership now, which is what the two headings have always said. Sharing
your own project is not the same event as somebody sharing theirs with
you.
The smoke test now follows the whole loop in one go: invite, accept in a
second browser, assign a task to the person who just joined, and find it
under their name — with the shared project still under "Projekter" on the
way past.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
Search covered task text only, so "regnskab" found nothing with the task
labelled @regnskab sitting in front of you — which reads as the search
box having lost it.
A label is often the only thing you remember. "That thing about the
accounts" is a search for @regnskab, not for any word in the title.
The label side is a plain lowercase match rather than a second FTS index.
Labels are short, and their names are typed by the same person now
searching for them, so there is no spelling to be generous about — the
diacritic folding that earns its keep on task text does not earn a second
index here.
The join sits inside the WHERE the visibility rules already build, so
somebody else's label cannot pull their task into your results. There is
a test for that, because it is the kind of thing an OR is good at
breaking.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <[email protected]>
